.
Feedback

School Board Meets Tuesday Night On Budget Cuts, Parcel Tax Poll Results

Results of survey to gauge voter reaction to potential parcel tax will be revealed and discussed at special 7 pm meeting at City Hall.

 

A special meeting of the Board of Directors takes place February 28 at 7 p.m. at to grapple with how to maintain the fiscal solvency of the district and at the same time preserve school programs.

Parcel tax survey results to be shared at meeting

At the school board's meeting on December 6 it approved a contract with The Center for Community Opinion. The contract authorized consultant Brad Senden to develop survey questions to assess community support and priorities for a potential parcel tax measure. Subsequently, the Board also entered into the contact with The Lew Edwards Group to advise the District regarding how to best proceed with a potential parcel tax.

For the past several months, a team consisting of consultants Brad Senden, Catherine Lew and Bonnie Jean von Krogh, representatives from CTA, SLTA, CSEA, Teamster/Trades, and SLMA, Deborah Cox chair person of the Measure B & M Bond Oversight Committee and District staff have met to develop and refine the survey questions.

During the week of February 12th, The Center for Community Opinion contacted approximately 400 voters and conducted the survey.

At 7:20 p.m. during Tuesday's meeting, Senden will provide highlights of the survey to be considered by board members.

San Leandro Unified School District Superintendant, Cindy Cathey posted the following message on the district's website about the meeting.

Dear Staff and Community Members,

Due to the budget crisis in the State of California since 2008, the Board of Education has had to repeatedly make difficult budget reduction decisions balancing their unwavering desire to preserve programs and services for students with their fiduciary responsibility to ensure the fiscal solvency of the District. 

The Governor’s proposed budget plan for 2012-2013 is filled with many unknowns, including whether or not his proposed tax initiative will be passed by the voters in November 2012.  Yet again, because of inadequate and unstable funding for education and because of the uncertainty associated with the Governor’s proposed budget, the Board must have a contingency plan in place if the tax initiative does not pass. 

Unfortunately, the Board cannot take a “wait and see” approach, because if the tax initiative does not pass, the cuts become effective on January 1, 2013.  This does not allow the Board adequate time to make new cuts.  The Board is left with no options other than prepare for the worst. 

While the Board has begun developing a $2.7 - $3M contingency plan, they must finalize the plan at this meeting.  These new cuts will be in addition to the severe cuts that are already slated to take place beginning July 1, 2012.  Those drastic cuts include:

San Leandro Unified School District

Budget Cuts for 2012-2013 and beyond

 

 

 

DRAFT

 

DESCRIPTION

2012 - 2013

2013 - 2014

1

Increase K-3 CSR to 32:1 - estimated 6 to 7 FTEs

$420,000

$420,000

2

Eliminate Middle School Counselors - 4.6 FTEs

$413,000

$413,000

3

Reduce 50% Instrumental Music

$85,000

$85,000

4

Reduce Lighthouse - 1.0 FTE

$64,000

$64,000

5

Reduce Campus supervisors - 2 FTEs

$90,000

$90,000

6

Eliminate Elementary Library Para Educators - 2.66 FTEs

$73,000

$73,000

7

Reduce VP - Middle & Elementary 1.0 FTE

$116,000

$116,000

8

Reduce Custodian - 1.0 FTE

$44,000

$44,000

9

Reduce AP Clerk -  .25 FTE

$15,000

$15,000

10

Reduce Maintenance Supervisor - .20 FTE

$19,000

$19,000

11

Eliminate Instructional Coach - Pilot Program - 1.0 FTE

$90,000

$90,000

 

TOTAL

$1,429,000

$1,429,000


These are very distressing times for public education and for San Leandro Unified in particular.  The lives of our employees and the essential programs and services to our students are profoundly impacted in ways that cannot be measured.  Every effort is being made to be sensitive and respectful to all of our employees, especially those who are affected by the reductions that have already been made and that are yet to come. 

While the Board is required to plan for additional reductions, they do want to hear from our employee groups and the public.  I hope that you are able to attend this meeting.

Sincerely,

Cindy M. Cathey

(To get San Leandro Patch delivered by email click here.)


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
california girl May 18, 2013 at 08:05 pm
I loved the green tea!
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 19, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Young man! The stormtroopers get into the act.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuJXaVrvpXE
Justin Agrella May 19, 2013 at 09:43 am
http://youtu.be/78LAgl90UyM
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
Scott Terry May 23, 2013 at 08:38 pm
Hi Christa...I'm the guy in the story that Anthony posted the link for, and I keep bees in SanRead More Leandro. There are several beekeepers in town, and bees will fly up to 3 miles to collect pollen and nectar, but I don't know if there are any beekeepers near you. If the city council approves the keeping of bees in city limits, then it's likely that someone will get bees closer to you, but you don't need to have a hive right on your property.
anthony May 18, 2013 at 04:31 pm
remembered reading this here, maybe ther's a forward in thereRead More somewhere...http://sanleandro.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/local-hungry-families-helped-by-urban-farmer. Don't hold me to this one, but I thought Tim at Zocalo Coffee was a keeper.
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
RHG May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Stefanie Pruegel January 29, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I would speculate that more durable, reusable bags still score a lot better than disposables, evenRead More if a small fraction of those are "dual use" as in the cases you point out (dog poop, trash can liner). BTW, for those concerned about a dwindling supply of free poop bags as a result of the ban, here are still plenty of plastic bags available for that purpose e.g. those that people's newspaper comes in. The bottom line is that most people would agree that reusable bags are the better solution than to continue choking our waterways with disposable plastic bags.
David January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm
There are plenty of competing studies that disagree. I perused that, and one huge faulty assumptionRead More that they have is that "single use" means single use when as we see above, people use them for dogs, garbage etc.
Stefanie Pruegel January 21, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Funny you should bring up cost/benefit analysis of disposable plastic bags vs reusable bags, David.Read More This is exactly what was done in 2010 by a coalition of several California cities and organizations, to help communities in the state gauge the impact of any ordinance they consider passing in regards to disposable bags. The upshot is that reusable bags (particularly non-woven plastic reusable bags) have significantly lower environmental impacts on a per-use basis than single-use plastic bags. Find the full study here: http://bit.ly/VWdEn9
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.