.
Feedback

Don't be fooled: public sector pensions or health care are not the problem

We must reject the lie that US society can't provide jobs, pensions we can live on and social services. These are not the problem, war, speculation and the market is.

Back in the mid 1980's I recall a protest in Pittsburg PA I believe it was.  The city had decided to have a new hotel built with non-Union Labor.  In response, about 50,000 building trades workers amassed downtown.  The city powers reversed their decision.  I remember a police official being interviewed and he admitted that the assembly violated the law but asked what could he do, throw 50,000 people in jail?


I had a similar experience on a smaller scale during our contract talks in 1997.  Our bosses had kept us pinned at the table arguing about our Cost of Living (COLA) clause in particular.  They brought all sorts of evidence and examples of how low inflation was and that it was never returning and even that the head of our international Union AFSCME, claimed that such clauses were unnecessary in these times.  We wouldn't give it up, a wage increase below inflation was a pay cut we argued and made an issue of it with our membership.  The bosses wouldn't budge.  Working for a public utility, they cared little about paying for all the meeting times, they would wear us down. But we never believed that victories were won through glib talk at the negotiating table---our power lay in our membership and their conscious involvement in the process.

The white collar workers were in another AFSCME local and we negotiated separately to the employers delight, talking with their leadership one day and us the next.  The leadership of the white collar Union always rejected our calls for joint  membership meetings and joint negotiations claiming their members were too backward, conservative, "spineless" one of them told us. At one point when it was tactically correct to do so, we forced a vote on it from their membership and the truth was revealed; their members voted for such meetings and these leaders all voted against them.

We ended up with with a joint strike committee meeting that close to a hundred people came to, janitors, painters, plumbers and water plant operators from our local, clerks, engineers, secretaries , buyers, from the white collar.  There were shop stewards, people I'd never seen before.  We had organized joint meetings in the past in spite of opposition from the leaders of the white collar Union and our own members at times who were influenced by local leaders, paid staff from our regional council and the international Union and the bosses who all sought to foster division between us, the blue collar against the white, men against women.  More women were in the white collar local.

In the next meeting with the bosses after these events the effect was stunning.  The concessions disappeared and about $1,000,000 in various forms fell in to our laps.  Management was suddenly quite generous.  Seeing this unity between the two groups brought concessions that months and months of talk at the negotiating table could not. No lawyers were needed, no glib tongues. "Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table."  said George Schultz, the US politician and economist.  Sometimes we can learn from our enemies.  * (See below)

What made me think about this bit of personal history is the situation right now with all the attacks on social services and those workers that provide them. US cities are declaring bankruptcy because these municipalities are broke.  We blogged on the situation in Scranton where the mayor cut city workers' pay to the minimum wage and the response from the heads of the Unions was to file a lawsuit.  This is the extent of their offensive arsenal.  The Wall Street Journal today reports that a promise of state aid has allowed the mayor to reverse that decision and the workers will receive their regular pay and be reimbursed with 6% interest.

In return for the state aid, or taxpayer funded (temporary) rescue, the council and state officials are about to agree on a new rescue plan which would raise Scranton's property taxes 33% over the next three years, "bringing the median property-tax bill to $470 from $353" says the WSJ.  And that is just for this year. In all these cases, it is public funds that come to the rescue in the end.  Both parties agree on one basic thing; workers and the middle class will pay.

This whole scenario, what amounts to terrorism, economic terrorism waged against workers and our communities, has been worked out beforehand.  First, workers are given the shock and awe treatment having their wages cut by 70% in some cases after the city has already slashed employment by 20%.  Union officials whine about how unfair this is and how hard members work and threaten lawsuits.  Then the bosses and their representatives on the city council and other municipal bodies back off and come back with slightly less drastic cuts, outwardly less drastic anyway.

With Scranton, the mayor announces that "I think they should get full wages.  I just literally didn't have the money" he says showing how much he cares.  Then a reminder to the community of why there is no money, why their property taxes have to be increased, "The biggest killer is pension and health care costs" he says.  So the scene is set. Greedy public sector workers, the last bastion of organized Labor in the US, is why your property taxes have to be increased cutting in to your personal income and why social services have to be reduced cutting in to our personal safety and recreation. We reject that society does not have the resources to provide basic things like housing, health care and a retirement that people can live on.

Union officials are skeptical and warn the mayor that if members don't get full pay "..we're going to be right back there file for contempt of court.".  This is why we have lost so much ground over the last 40 years to the point where inequality is greater in the US than in China.  To the Labor officialdom, the Unions are simply employment agencies with them as the CEO's.  They are just "Labor Brokers."  Despite having the potential power to bring the US economy to a halt, they play this game with the 1% every time.  For them, their members are a source of funds and free Labor for the Democratic Party at election time.

In the case of Scranton like everywhere else, the leadership of organized Labor will support the property tax increases which divides workers while increasing hostility towards public sector workers for our "costly pensions and wages that are bankrupting our communities."  This weakens us overall just like racism and sexism does.  The role played by the Labor officialdom has also delayed the rise of a powerful and united direct action movement that can turn this tide.   The alternative of course would be to fight for jobs and pensions for everyone building a movement to make the rich pay for this crisis; the money is there as we have explained in numerous commentaries. To challenge the market and its adherents, which means actually fighting back,  can only lead to chaos for the Labor heads, and they will not take this path voluntarily.  It is for this reason that the Occupy Movement and movements like it that will develop in the period ahead, are somewhat messy, confused and at times counterproductive despite the intentions or integrity of many of the players.

My experience as a member and local leader in a small blue collar Union that was very democratic with a history of militancy dating back to the 1960's taught me who my friends are, where my power lies and it is not in the courts or the Democratic Party but in the growth of organized workers on the job, in our communities and in the political arena independent of the two capitalist parties.

Some examples of what Union leaders, politicians, and activists who claim to have workers' interests at heart could campaign for and organize around:

No bailouts for bankers---take back our money
Make the 1% pay--no tax increases for workers or the middle class--tax commercial property, not community businesses.
Tax all trades on the stock exchanges
End all foreign wars
Federally funded education at all levels--immediate hiring of one million teachers
Health care for all at point of need
Expand and increase state pensions to all workers--lower retirement age to 50
Increase spending on mass transit and infrastructure
For a $15 an hour minimum wage or $5 an hour wage increase whichever is greater
For a 5-day 30 hour workweek
Build an independent non Wall Street political party based in workers' organizations and our communities
Take under public ownership the banks and finance houses (provide cheap credit to community business) and allocate capital for social need not to bail out the banksters.

As we read this let's remember:
(1) Six members of the Walton family (Wal-Mart heirs) have more wealth than 90 million Americans
(2) The super rich have between 21 and 32 trillion dollars stashed away in offshore secret accounts.

* After this negotiations we wrote an assessment of it.  For any co-workers (or anyone else) that wants to read it we have created a page here

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
california girl May 18, 2013 at 08:05 pm
I loved the green tea!
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 19, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Young man! The stormtroopers get into the act.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuJXaVrvpXE
Justin Agrella May 19, 2013 at 09:43 am
http://youtu.be/78LAgl90UyM
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
anthony May 18, 2013 at 04:31 pm
remembered reading this here, maybe ther's a forward in thereRead More somewhere...http://sanleandro.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/local-hungry-families-helped-by-urban-farmer. Don't hold me to this one, but I thought Tim at Zocalo Coffee was a keeper.
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
RHG May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Stefanie Pruegel January 29, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I would speculate that more durable, reusable bags still score a lot better than disposables, evenRead More if a small fraction of those are "dual use" as in the cases you point out (dog poop, trash can liner). BTW, for those concerned about a dwindling supply of free poop bags as a result of the ban, here are still plenty of plastic bags available for that purpose e.g. those that people's newspaper comes in. The bottom line is that most people would agree that reusable bags are the better solution than to continue choking our waterways with disposable plastic bags.
David January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm
There are plenty of competing studies that disagree. I perused that, and one huge faulty assumptionRead More that they have is that "single use" means single use when as we see above, people use them for dogs, garbage etc.
Stefanie Pruegel January 21, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Funny you should bring up cost/benefit analysis of disposable plastic bags vs reusable bags, David.Read More This is exactly what was done in 2010 by a coalition of several California cities and organizations, to help communities in the state gauge the impact of any ordinance they consider passing in regards to disposable bags. The upshot is that reusable bags (particularly non-woven plastic reusable bags) have significantly lower environmental impacts on a per-use basis than single-use plastic bags. Find the full study here: http://bit.ly/VWdEn9
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.