.
Feedback

New San Leandro Police Contract: Pay For Pensions In Return For Raises

City estimates total cost of deal at $50,000 over three year as the contract holds compensation essentially flat while officers move toward making full pension payments.

 

City officials today unveiled a new three-year contract with San Leandro police officers.

It will hold police compensation essentially flat over the next three years in a deal that requires officers to contribute toward their pensions in return for raises to offset the new deductions from their paychecks.

Until now the city had paid the entire 9 percent of salary that officers in most other cities pay into their own pension funds.

But under the deal announced by Mayor Stephen Cassidy and Sergeant Isaac Benabou of the Police Officers Association, the city's sworn employees will move toward paying their own pension costs in three steps.

  • In 2013 officers will pay 3 percent of salary toward their pensions, with the city making up the other six percent.
  • In 2014, officers will pay 6 percent of salary, with the city share decreasing to 3 percent.
  • By 2015, the third and final year of the contract, officers will contribute 9 percent of salary and the city will cease its subsidy.

In return, officers will get across the board raises of 4 percent in 2014 and 3 percent in 2015.

Officers who have served the city longer will get some additional sweeteners.

In 2014 officers with more than 20 years seniority will get an additional 1 percent raise on top of the 4 percent overall hike.

And in 2015 the city will create a new pay grade for officers with 6 or more years on the city payroll. Officers in this category will get 5 percent in addition to the across the board 3 percent raise that year.

When all these changes are totaled the city estimates that taxpayers will save about $154,000 in 2013 and $103,000 in 2014. In 2015 the contract will increase the cost of police compensation to $304,500.

That works out to be a total cost of about $50,000 over three years. That figure should be applied against $9.86 million a year in compensation for officers covered by the contract, according to the city.

Another way to look at it is through the paycheck of a current top grade officer who earns $7,754 a month.

In 2013 the pension deduction will be about $232 per month. It take three years to restore that amount -- although senior officers will get even sooner.

"It's pretty much standing still," Sgt. Benabou said. "It's not increases but it's not cuts like some of the neighboring cities."

Mayor Cassidy said he was pleased with the deal because the cost of health and pension benefits have been rising rapidly. Thus even if employees don't get raises, taxpayers face increasing costs.

"This deal helps bring those benefit costs under control," Cassidy said.

The contract announced today covers 82 officers and sergeants. The city has about 400 employees in three other bargaining units. Those contracts have yet to be finalized.

The police contract is set to take effect April 1. It is not retroactive.

What's your take on the new contract?

jeffrey olsen March 19, 2013 at 08:12 pm
this mayor is not a solver,He is putter offer actually,bigger salaries means not only that we taxpayers pay for overpaid police offices we pay toward their pensions, but we are inflate the pensions again.Earlier this mayor collect his staff in box and will go out of City Hall -much more better,go,Sir,go....
One more as I know from a private conversation the police officers understand that their salaries and pensions are way over inflated...But nobody will refused to get more for the same work, if taxpayers keep silence..And we have no problems with people who want to work in police for smaller money, but try to be hired if you don't have connections in SLPD or City Hall
David March 19, 2013 at 09:04 pm
Salaries are easier to modify in the future.
A modest proposal. All new patrol officers will be hired at NYPD pay scales and benefits. For ever 2 cops that quit/retire, we could hire 3 at NYPD rates. Overpaid cops are a public safety issue, by making Bay Area communities extraordinarily underpoliced relative to the national average and the national urban average of cops/residents.
Marga Lacabe March 19, 2013 at 11:06 pm
Congratulations to whoever negotiated this contract, both sides believe they came out on top! That's pretty hard to do!.
jeffrey olsen March 20, 2013 at 12:14 am
Problem that the both negotiators were on one side and have another love on taxpayers.Only mentally ill person could believe that mr.Cassidy on SL citizens and taxpayers side.His moral had been shown when he promised no new taxes or fees in election time,and provides a standing ovation to any new tax,fee or price increase(BART) now. This person looks at the world from the public unions pocket I believe.
Larry Smith March 20, 2013 at 11:43 am
Create a new pay grade for officers after six years of service? Where do I sign up; what a great deal for police officers and what a dumb, kick-the-can down the road deal for citizens of San Leandro who will have to pick up the tab after two years (April 2015) to the tune of a TWELVE PER CENT raise. Or, should we say a raise in excess of $1000 per month for every officer with six years service.
River City move over, San Leandro needs a marching band too, and they have a Mayor that likes to spend money like a sailor on shore leave.
David March 20, 2013 at 12:32 pm
Again, next step in 2015 is to re-negotiate actual pay grades. It's harder to cut benefits than to modify salaries, and benefits are an open-ended, unlimited liability. Salaries are not.
My mayoral platform for 2016: NYPD pay grades. Good enough for New York's finest, great for San Leandro.
Tom Abate (Editor) March 20, 2013 at 01:32 pm
I don't get the math on the $1,000 per month raises for officers above six years. Does it subtract out for the 9 percent of salary that these officers will pay toward pensions that year, an expense formerly borne by the city. The comparison of San Leandro to New York City pay rates is sobering. The top scale SL officer earns a pre-tax income of $93,000 a year before overtime and benefits. After I wrote the basic story I got another detail from the city; the 82 officers included in this discussion cost the city about $9.6 million per year, which works out to a bit over $120,000 per officer in total compensation.
jeffrey olsen March 20, 2013 at 04:57 pm
We need real numbers ,not 93000 pretax you believe ms.chief and her captains make.this mayor is a professional in lying,remember his election promises and track these promises today,We need a really independent bookkeeper, which should be hired not by the police union or the city hall, to know the real honest numbers,and these number will be outrageous I believe. Mayors and diapers should be changed frequently and all for the same reason.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David June 19, 2013 at 07:44 pm
Rob, *I* provide decent, safe, affordable housing for low income folks. It can be done. Yes, IRead More take Section 8 vouchers. Guess what, they work, and they disperse poverty so you do not end up concentrating poor people into a ghetto. All you're doing is creating ghettos. As for the religious women, surely you understand the difference between charity freely given and taxes confiscated from me at the point of a gun.
David June 19, 2013 at 07:46 pm
As previously mentioned, if there were a "shortage" of affordable housing, rather thanRead More creating a brand new ghetto in the middle of downtown SL, those tax dollars could have gone to buying up blocks of foreclosed houses and fixing them up. But you'd rather build new construction at a higher cost to taxpayers. Wonder why...
Rob Rich June 19, 2013 at 08:00 pm
If there wasn't a demand, people wouldn't be lining up dozens deep for every unit. These will beRead More nice units, well managed. There are folks buying up & rehabbing foreclosed properties. Remember, I sent you a link? As for your distaste for taxes (except perhaps when they fund your splendid education), the Sisters disagree w
Erica June 18, 2013 at 07:16 pm
What brand is the pastry cutter?
Rowena Peñalba June 18, 2013 at 11:27 pm
It's slightly used but I don't remember where I bought it from. I don't see any brand name on it. IRead More just priced it based on the lowest one available on Amazon. If you're interested, make me an offer. Maybe we can agree on it. Thanks for your inquiry.
Elaine Cooperstein June 19, 2013 at 03:16 pm
Can't remember what night this was, but recently we were startled by noises and decided it must haveRead More been fireworks at the coliseum.
Mattie Ignacio June 13, 2013 at 06:02 pm
it was a hundred times better...it is now useless!
Richard Eisenman June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
I'm not a very regular viewer. Could you be a bit more specific about what changed recently (plusesRead More and minuses)? Thanks.
Jessica Gardner June 18, 2013 at 05:43 pm
i agree!!
Opera On Tap Co-Manager, Indre Viskontas
Joanna Dyer June 12, 2013 at 07:16 am
F
Molly Rosen June 14, 2013 at 04:36 pm
One of the best operas ever. I hope to see it. How excited for OOT and San Leandro!
Susan Reisz June 10, 2013 at 07:29 pm
Can you reprint this several times prior to June 27. I don't want people to forget about it? Thanks