.
Feedback

History Files: Korematsu's Stand for Justice

Read about Korematsu's decades-long fight against the wrong of Japanese internment. Then, attend this Sunday's San Leandro Historical Society event presenting Tak Kato and his family's internment experience.

A Crime?

On May 30, 1942, a young man was arrested in San Leandro and transferred to a U.S. Marshall in San Francisco.  His crime?  He appeared to be Japanese, and a few months earlier all people of Japanese descent on the West coast had been ordered to report for internment.

While waiting in the San Francisco county jail, Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu was visited by the director of the San Francisco office of the American Civil Liberties Union. Would he be willing to become the test case to challenge the constitutionality of the government’s imprisonment of Japanese Americans?

Korematsu was born in Oakland, California, in 1919. He attended public schools, participated in the Castlemont High School tennis and swim teams, and worked in his family flower nursery near San Leandro. He had tried to enlist in the U.S. National Guard and the U.S. Coast Guard when America entered World War II, but was turned away.

He was an American. Americans had the right to a fair trial—why should he be locked away without a chance to prove his loyalty? He thought it was wrong, and he chose to defy the order. He had even undergone minor plastic surgery to alter his eyes in an attempt to look less Japanese.

He agreed to challenge the constitutionality of Japanese incarceration.

Conviction in Federal Court

In September, 1942, Korematsu was convicted in federal court for violating the military orders issued under Executive Order 9066 (the order signed by President Roosevelt authorizing the military to remove people of Japanese descent from their homes and force them into prison camps). He was placed on a five-year probation and sent to the Tanforan Assembly Center in San Bruno. For a few months, he lived in the former horse stalls that were used for temporary incarceration of people of Japanese ancestry.  Eventually, he and his family were transferred to Topaz, Utah, one of ten incarceration camps for Japanese Americans during World War II.

Appeal and Landmark Decision

Korematsu appealed his case all the way to the U. S. Supreme Court. Korematsu v. United States in 1944 upheld his conviction and the exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Robert Jackson noted that “the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination…The Principle then lies about like a loaded weapon, ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.”

Topaz and After

Shunned by many Japanese at Topaz who feared repercussions from association with someone who had defied American law, Korematsu still felt he was in the right. After the war, his conviction affected his ability to find a job. While working in Salt Lake City, he discovered he was being paid half of what his white coworkers were paid. When he told his boss this was unfair, the boss threatened to call the police and get him arrested for being Japanese.

Korematsu never quit believing in his innocence and in the unconstitutionality of Japanese incarceration during World War II.

Determination Brings a Second Chance

In 1983, a commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians concluded that the decision to remove people of Japanese ancestry to U.S. prison camps occurred because of “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.” About the same time, researchers Peter Irons and Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga discovered secret Justice Department documents while searching government archives. Official reports in 1943 and 1944 from the FBI, the Office of Naval Intelligence, and other agencies denied that Japanese Americans had committed any wrongdoing.

These reports should have been evidence in Korematsu v. United States, but were intentionally suppressed, and in one case, destroyed. On the basis of this governmental misconduct, Korematsu v. United States was reopened by a legal team of pro bono lawyers.

“According to the Supreme Court decision regarding my case,” Korematsu said to the judge, “being an American citizen was not enough. They say you have to look like one, otherwise they say you can’t tell a difference between a loyal and a disloyal American.  I thought that this decision was wrong and I still feel that way. . .Therefore, I would like to see the government admit that they were wrong and do something about it so this will never happen again to any American citizen of any race, creed or color.”

On November 10, 1983, a U. S. District Court Judge in San Francisco formally overturned Korematsu’s conviction. Forty-one years after his conviction, Korematsu’s belief that the government was wrong was confirmed.

The Legacy of Quiet Determination in a Search for Justice

Korematsu continued to fight for justice. He lobbied for an official apology from the U.S. Government and reparations to Japanese Americans incarcerated during World War II, which President Reagan signed in 1988. Ten years later, President Clinton presented him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.  After 9/11, Korematsu filed a “Friend of the Court” brief on behalf of Muslim inmates being held at Guantanamo Bay.

The freshman campus at San Leandro High School is named for this civil rights hero.

Korematsu died in 2005 at the age of eight-six. Hundreds of people packed his memorial service, honoring the man whose decades-long fight for justice demonstrates how one determined person can right a wrong.

This article is mostly based on the biography prepared by the Korematsu Institute and Karen Korematsu, found at www.korematsuinstitute.org.

The San Leandro Historical Society presents San Leandro resident Tak Kato, speaking and showing historical and personal photographs of his family’s internment during World War II at Topaz. Kato was only a child during the war, but remembers good times and bad during his family's internment. Don’t miss this free history talk providing a personal story of a historical event. When: Sunday, March 3, at 1:00. Where:  At the Little Brown Church, behind the Casa Peralta, 384 West Estudillo Avenue in San Leandro.  For more information click to email http://www.sanleandrohistory.org/contact or call 510-910-3215.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
How did this go from "Ways for San Leandro Teachers to Save in the Classroom" to aRead More advertisement for Staples? I am wondering what Jessica Mitchell does for a living.
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.