.
Feedback

City, Church Leaders Still Raw Over $3.37 Million Faith Fellowship Deal

What did San Leandro learn from its $2.3 million settlement and $737,614 in legal expenses? Was the city wrong from the start? City and church leaders disagree.

 

In 2006, Faith Fellowship Pastor Gary Mortara tried to move his fast-growing congregation from Washington Manor to a building in the industrial zone.

The city denied the move because it conflicted with zoning.

A legal battle ensued that went to the U.S. Supreme Court and was recently settled when the city agreed to pay the church $2.3 million.

It cost taxpayers another $737,614 to try the case: $605,552 went to the Meyers Nave law firm in legal fees and and $132,062 was spent on depositions, experts, court reporters, and other costs.

In retrospect was the city wrong to pursue the case?

What did San Leandro get for its $3.37 million?

Patch asked city decision makers who were involved six years ago:

  1. former city manager John Jermanis,
  2. former mayor Tony Santos,
  3. city council members Michel Gregory, Jim Prola and Diana Souza
  4. and city attorney Jayne Williams   

Santos, Souza and Williams replied.

They said, in essence, that San Leandro had to defend its zoning code. And what the city got for its $3.37 million was an end to the legal headaches and a zoning code that remains intact. Here are excerpts from their replies.

  • Councilmember Souza: "No, I do not believe the city erred in the initial denial of the variance. The City got an end to this case brought against us, while preserving our zoning code. We defended our zoning codes and we admitted no wrong doing."
  • City Attorney Jayne Williams said when the church bought the property it waived a contingency clause that would have allowed it to back out of the purchase if the city denied its variance. But Faith Fellowship had a favorable law on its side: The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). "The City had a very strong case but RLUIPA unfairly puts cities between a rock and hard place," Williams wrote. "Considering the cost of a trial and likely lengthy appeals, in addition to RLUIPA’ s attorney’s fees provisions (settlement made sense). The litigation is now concluded and the City’s land use plan and goals remain intact."
  • Former Mayor Santos said negotiations went on in the background as city staff tried to meet the church's needs at some other site. " There is a lot more here than I can detail," he said, "but in my opinion Pastor Mortara and his elders brought it all on themselves and Staff/City did all it could to accommodate them, without success."

Many Commented, Including Pastor Gary 

A story about the settlement drew dozens of comments, including this reply from "Pastor Gary" addressed to the former mayor:

"Really Mr. Santos? Do you forget sir, that you called me into your office and said to me, "I want you in that building?" Do you forget sir, that in my office I handed you written letters from the businesses in the area ALL welcoming our church into that building and you took it to show Mr. Jermanis and then I didn't hear from you again?

We were asked by city staff to file a rezone application, which we did. We were asked to pay $2,000 for the application, we did. We were not heard by the council until a year later.

You say you offered us alternative sites. Where?

John Jermanis said in legal depositions that there were no other buildings for FF to relocate too. We told you we were not married to this building, that if you had another one we would take it . . . 

. . . The reason we settled for $2.3 is we never wanted money from the city. We just wanted your support. We could have won much more in the trial, but it would have cost everyone more money that only the attorneys really end up winning. The $2.3 is nothing. We lost twice that, sir.

A building was all, and is all, we need and needed. Period. We didn't need anything else."

Where do things stand?

Faith Fellowship is still looking for a new location in San Leandro, Mortara told Patch. Where, he didn't specify. Look for more on that later.

(Get San Leandro Patch delivered by email. Like us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter @sanleandropatch. Or start your own blog.)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
How did this go from "Ways for San Leandro Teachers to Save in the Classroom" to aRead More advertisement for Staples? I am wondering what Jessica Mitchell does for a living.
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.