70 State Parks Slated for Closure; Mt. Diablo Spared

“Californians across the state have now heard the proverbial shoe drop for our state parks system,” said Elizabeth Goldstein, president of the California State Parks Foundation in a news release.

California State Parks announced a plan Friday to close up to 70 of its 278 parks due to budget cuts. The parks are slated to close in July 2012, at the start of the fiscal year.

No East Bay parks are on the list, including . 

However, the 70 on the list include a number of popular Northern California parks within easy driving distance, including Jack London State Park in Sonoma County, Samuel P. Taylor State Park in Marin County, Henry W. Coe State Parknear Morgan Hill; Castle Rock and Twin Lakes State Beach in Santa Cruz County; Portola Redwoods in San Mateo County; Moss Landing State Beach and Limekiln State Park in Big Sur.

Popular, oft-visited parks such as Hearst Castle, Big Basin, parks around Lake Tahoe and popular Southern California beaches will remain open. 

The closures are necessary to achieve an $11-million reduction in the next fiscal year 2011/12, and $22 million in the following fiscal year 2012/13, California State Parks spokesperson Roy Stearns said in a news release.

These cuts were mandated by Assembly Bill 95, which was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown in March.

The California State Parks Foundation strongly opposes the closures.

"Californians across the state have now heard the proverbial shoe drop for our state parks system,” said Elizabeth Goldstein, president of CSPF. “Closing these parks is going in the wrong direction.”

Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries, R-Lake Elsinore, introduced Assembly Bill 64 to encourage the Department of Parks and Recreation to actively seek to negotiate operating agreements with local governments. The bill was killed on the Assembly floor May 2. 

Those who spoke in opposition to the bill stated they will only support "comprehensive" budget solutions that include $11 billion in DMV, sales tax and personal income tax increases for the next five years, Jeffries’ office wrote.

"It is very disappointing when a bill that could protect some of our state parks from closure at no additional expense for the state is killed to make a misguided partisan political point," Assemblyman Jeffries said in a May 3 news release. "This bill could have saved the state money and preserved park access, but the ruling majority decided to hold parks hostage for partisan gain."

Reached by phone Friday, Jeffries said the State Capitol is sending a confusing message.

"The governor is announcing the closure of State Parks, but saying we need to find more ways to work with local governments. And then you have my bill which promotes the exact same thing. It is a real challenging time to figure out...the closure list is going to wake everybody up," Jeffries said.

Ruth Coleman, director of California State Parks, said they regret closing any parks.

“But with the proposed budget reductions over the next two years, we can no longer afford to operate all parks within the system,” Coleman said in a news release.

“These cuts are unfortunate, but the state’s current budget crisis demands that tough decisions be made,” said Resources Secretary John Laird. “Hopefully, Republicans in the legislature will agree to allow California voters to decide whether we extend currently existing taxes or make deeper cuts to our parks.”

When reached by phone Friday, Stearns said the department will avoid any layoffs as a result of the parks closures.

"We have about 500 vacancies in the system. We hope to move those employees to positions in other parks that are still operating," Stearns said.

Stearns said it is about a 2,300-position system, but they have been operating at 500 less than were employed by State Parks in 1979.

"We've also get about 10 million more visitors per year with about 500,000 more acres," he added.

The land will go into caretaker status, according to Stearns.

"We won't sell it or dispose of it in any way." He said park rangers and maintenance people will check on the properites periodically.

How the Parks Were Chosen

State Parks had three primary goals for developing the closure methodology:

(1) protect the most significant natural and cultural resources, (2) maintain public access and revenue generation to the greatest extent possible and (3) protect closed parks so that they remain attractive and usable for potential partners. The methodology was included in the budget bill approved by the Legislature and the governor in March.

Despite the large number of parks identified for closure, at least 92 percent of today’s attendance will be retained, 94 percent of existing revenues will be preserved, and 208 parks will remain open, according to California State Parks. 

“State Parks believes the methodology developed preserves and protects parks critical to the mission, which provide for the diversity of experiences wanted by visitors across the state,” Stearns said.

“For instance, State Parks has a variety of state historic parks, state beaches, state recreation areas, state nature reserves and state parks and most of the parks in all categories will remain open to serve the diverse preferences of park visitors,” Stearns continued.

“With this announcement, we can begin to seek additional partnership agreements to keep open as many parks as possible,” added Coleman. “We already have 32 operating agreements with our partners – cities, counties and non-profits – to operate state parks, and will be working statewide to expand that successful template.”

Here is a list of all the parks closing statewide:

Marsh State Historic Park

Annadel State Park

Antelope Valley Indian Museum

Austin Creek State Recreation Area

Bale Grist Mill State Historic Park

Benbow Lake State Recreation Area

Benicia Capitol State Historic Park

Benicia State Recreation Area

Bidwell Mansion State Historic Park

Bothe-Napa Valley State Park

Brannan Island State Recreation Area

California Mining & Mineral Museum

Candlestick Point State Recreation Area

Castle Crags State Park

Castle Rock State Park

China Camp State Park

Colusa-Sacramento River State Recreation Area

Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park

Fort Humboldt State Historic Park

Fort Tejon State Historic Park

Garrapata State Park

George J. Hatfield State Recreation Area

Governor's Mansion State Historic Park

Gray Whale Cove State Beach

Greenwood State Beach

Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park

Hendy Woods State Park

Henry W. Coe State Park

Jack London State Historic Park

Jug Handle State Nature Reserve 

Leland Stanford Mansion State Historic Park

Limekiln State Park

Los Encinos State Historic Park

Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park

Manchester State Park

McConnell State Recreation Area

McGrath State Beach

Mono Lake Tufa State Nature Reserve

Morro Strand State Beach

Moss Landing State Beach

Olompali State Historic Park

Palomar Mountain State Park

Petaluma Adobe State Historic Park

Picacho State Recreation Area

Pio Pico State Historic Park

Plumas-Eureka State Park

Point Cabrillo Light Station

Portola Redwoods State Park

Providence Mountains State Recreation Area

Railtown 1897 State Historic Park

Russian Gulch State Park

Saddleback Butte State Park

Salton Sea State Recreation Area

Samuel P. Taylor State Park

San Pasqual Battlefield State Historic Park

Santa Cruz Mission State Historic Park

Santa Susana Pass State Historic Park

Shasta State Historic Park

South Yuba River State Historic Park

Standish-Hickey State Recreation Area

Sugarloaf Ridge State Park

SP Tomales Bay State Park

Tule Elk State Nature Reserve

Turlock Lake State Recretion Area

Twin Lakes State Beach

Weaverville Joss House State Historic Park

Westport-Union Landing State Beach

William B. Ide Adobe State Historic Park

Woodson Bridge SRA Zmudowski State Beach

John L. May 14, 2011 at 05:22 PM
I understand the State is trying to save money, that's an easy one to understand. But.....closing our backyards does not make any sense at all. The best analogy I can come up with is this.....I live in a home that I am still paying Wells Fargo Bank for and will be for another 26 years. I fell that I just got a letter from Wells telling me that I cannot go into my backyard anymore, I can look at it from inside my house but I cannot step foot on it. I believe like another poster here in that when things get tough, many of the places people go is to our State Parks, they should still be available to us for enjoyment during this fiscal crisis no matter what.
David May 14, 2011 at 05:52 PM
This is the "Washington Monument" strategy that California pulls every budget debate. Threaten to close state parks, cut off welfare "for the children," jack up college tuition and kill old people. Then put the tin cup out and get people to raise taxes on themselves. It's funny how they never seem to threaten to cut pensions, Legislators' car allowances, the 500 "commissions" where retired politicians soak up more tax dollars and think of job-killing regulations, or threaten to bring our prison costs in-line with other states.
wyatt May 14, 2011 at 07:45 PM
I agree, I think that the whole gov is jacked. I am 15 and I see this!!! What I see is that the gov is looking at going bankrupt. I look at the gov as like a kid. They aren’t trying anything for its self but when are sits down and conjure all of its self up to get a lot of stuff done. But it is like most kids, it will get lazy. As you can see from the gov's pocketbook it is lazy. And we as the cells of this body are wanting a change. The kid like most adolescents do we look for a parent to get us through like give us money, a ride, and such. But we have only one parent, A MOM. The name of that parent is CHINA. China is the only thing that is keeping us alive. And as a parent we are dependent and china is a like dependent on us. If we didn’t buy anything they product then they would let us droned!!! This is the truth from a 15 year old child's eyes. O_O
Gail Soldavini May 14, 2011 at 09:47 PM
Samuel P Taylor is not only filled up, but has an overflow camping area which is also filled almost very night. Reservations don't necessarily indicate whether a park is full. I use the parks frequently and took my classes to them on a regular basis before I retired. Many famlies didn't know they existed and were enthralled by their visits, returning regularly. Once closd, I doubt they will ever re-open. We will have lost treasures.
Thomas Pramuk May 21, 2011 at 02:05 PM
No way should we as a State give up these gorgeous State Park areas to "private parties" to do as they see fit. Everywhere you look in Northern California you see development. "Green Zones" are lost every day. I have spent tens of thousands of hours in 15 Northern California State Parks, in all four seasons. The amount of enjoyment (and fabulous fitness) I have had is priceless. These Parks are the "crown jewels" of California. Untouched, raw in so many ways, natural the way they should be. I have faith that the budget crisis will be resolved one day. And these parks will reopen. Till then, let them rest. In no way should we allow developers to destroy what took nature thousands of years to create.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »