.
Feedback

Village Marketplace Delay A Blessing in Disguise?

The Kaiser Hospital and Lit San Leandro fiber optic loop will transform the city. Fred Reicker urges residents and officials to rethink the use of this downtown parcel.

 

(By now you probably know that the proposed Village Marketplace has lost its second anchor tenant in three months. Leah Hall wrote a recent op-ed calling on the community to come up with a new plan. It drew dozens of response. Today former general plan advisor Fred Reicher adds his voice to the call for a fresh look at the property and its potential.)

 

The scramble to find a new anchor tenant for the Village Marketplace and consequent delay of the project could be a blessing in disguise. It gives San Leandro time to think about its probable future before moving ahead with the development as currently planned.

Leah Hall is right-on when she says current thinking will give San Leandro only more of what it already has. Rather, the city should see the site as an exceptional opportunity to tailor a development on prime downtown property that accommodates and reflects the changes occurring in our community.

Consider the following.

San Leandro is on the cusp of transformative change. The new Kaiser Permanente medical complex will itself bring in more than 2,500 people, from office staff to technical support to physicians. There’s no telling how many ancillary businesses will take root around the complex, bringing in still more employees.

All of these folks will represent a kaleidoscopic array of interests, needs, wants and incomes.

Perhaps more importantly the Lit San Leandro fiber optic loop matches the fastest in the nation. With its new Chief Innovation Officer, the city is poised to become an innovation center.

The city already is home to OSIsoft (which funded the loop’s first 11 miles) and several other tech firms. Now it can lure other companies that inhabit the universe of advanced manufacturing, medical research, green energy, and digital print, video and media services.

The prospect of more hundreds, even thousands, of skilled, well-paid employees in San Leandro and their beneficial impact on the community must be anticipated.

A case in point is Seattle, now the tony, high-tech center 800 miles up the road.

In the 1970s, The Economist magazine labeled Seattle “the city of despair” because of an exodus of companies, the downward spiral of the economy and deteriorating neighborhoods. Then, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Paul Allen decide to move their then nascent company from Albuquerque, a more likely venue at the time, to Seattle because they wanted to go home.

Microsoft attracted other innovation companies and venture capitalists. For example, Jeff Bezos later moved Amazon.com to Seattle because of the “availability of human capital” and financial resources.

In his book The New Geography of Jobs, U.C. Berkeley Economics Professor Enrico Moretti goes on to report that Microsoft reshaped Seattle in another way. It’s estimated that prosperous Microsoft alumni have started 4,000 businesses in the Puget Sound area. Silicon Valley/the Bay Area are analogous and encompass San Leandro.

Prof. Moretti estimates that Microsoft has created 120,000 jobs in the service sector that require limited education (services, trades, small business owners), and 80,000 professional positions.

He cites research that shows one high job creates five additional local jobs in the long term, both professional and service/trades, etc. A heavy manufacturing job creates 1.6 new jobs. The difference reflects the higher salaries of tech jobs which inject more money into a local economy and boost demand for a host of services and goods.

The transformation of Seattle into a vibrant and attractive city tracked a pattern seen in the history of innovation clusters, says Moretti. Cities become attractive because they succeeded in building a solid economic base and not vice versa. Seattle blossomed only after a high tech cluster took root.

San Leandro is not apt to become a Seattle, but it does have the assets to build a major innovation cluster. The principle at work is obvious. The implications are profound and exciting.

So the city should think again, and then perhaps again, about the former Albertson’s property. The desire to get something-anything- done now may not be the highest and best use of the site considering the community’s very promising prospects.

(From 1999 to 2001 Fred Reicker was a member of the San Leandro General Plan Advisory Committee.)

Click on the link to read more about San Leandro's Innovation Economy.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
How did this go from "Ways for San Leandro Teachers to Save in the Classroom" to aRead More advertisement for Staples? I am wondering what Jessica Mitchell does for a living.
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.