.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Red Light Camera Contract Flawed

Roger Jones, a retiree and resident of Fremont, weighs in on the debate over red light cameras and the proposed new contract between Redflex and the City of San Leandro.

(Copy of a letter sent to the city and provided by the author to Patch.)

City of San Leandro

Honorable Councilmembers:

The newly proposed agreement with Redflex Traffic Systems for photo enforcement in San Leandro should not be approved. There are some flaws in the proposal.

1. There needs to be a better escape clause. Some Redflex contracts have required only a 30-day notice to cancel the contract after some initial period of time whereby Redflex can recover their capital outlay. Usually this no-cost cancellation is well within the first 5 years of the first contract. Redflex has already recovered their costs from San Leandro. As it stands now, San Leandro could be on the hook for many thousands of dollars should they want out.


2. You are being asked to pay too much rent. You need not pay even the reduced price of $5,200 per month for the existing 5 cameras. Other cities pay far less.

 

Oceanside: $3,052 per month      Hawthorne $2,800 per month
Ventura $1,800 per month           Santa Clarita $4,000 per month
Gardena $3,500 per month          Garden Grove $2,900 per month
South Gate $2,829 per month      Escondido $2,833 per month
Fremont $4,800 per month

 

3. There is no need for an 7+ year term. Especially with no better escape clause. The laws governing cameras are continually being challenged. California's legislature recently approved a reduction in fines for illegal right turns. While this bill was vetoed, a similar bill in the future will impact the city's ability to raise enough money through fines to pay for the cameras. Also, what if the City changes increases its yellow light timings or the law stipulates a longer yellow light at camera approaches. It has been shown that this alone can reduce violations by up to 80%. Cal Trans recently added a mere 7/10's of a second to just one yellow light in Fremont and that city will lose about $150,000 per year in net revenue. Again, this would impact San Leandro's ability to raise money to pay for cameras and the taxpayers may be on the hook for the difference for years.

Also, your negotiating position will be much improved by delaying ratification of a new contract at this time. Simply extend the current terms on a month-to-month basis while alluding to the city's interest in (a) not prosecuting right turn violations as aggressively due to the high fine to your residents during these harsh economic times, and (b) studying the effect that extending yellow light times may have on reducing red light running. Redflex can ill afford to lose another client city. Redflex has shown their rates are predicated on a city's ability to raise revenue through fines.

Roger Jones

Fremont resident

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Chris Crow April 7, 2011 at 12:42 pm
Like
Also his last sentence is exactly why section G of the Vehicle code 21455.5 was added and how these compensation requirements are being viewed in the courts.
Richard Eisenman January 6, 2013 at 03:44 am
A recent report by NJ DOT indicates that traffic cameras do not increase intersection safety overall. But another issue that is perhaps more important is the overall negative impact on citizen morale by such monitoring devices. And, of course, if citizens don't like what government is doing, they are going to be more resistant to increased government taxation.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
anthony June 18, 2013 at 09:24 am
so is Strobridge, Castro Valley Bart...excellent farmer's market too. pick another if you want, IRead More have more as well. www.bridgehousing.com
David June 18, 2013 at 09:30 am
And you think that plunking down a very low income housing project in the middle of cheap housing inRead More San Leandro is more like Castro Valley? or more like West/East Oakland. It's more like the latter. Can't wait for the drive-by shootings and muggings to ratchet up when we thrown away $9M in tax dollars on building a new downtown SL BART ghetto.
Rob Rich June 18, 2013 at 12:35 pm
It is unfortunate the Bridge has been unable to stop all crime in Oakland. Sadly, that lesson willRead More probably apply to San Leandro too.
Mattie Ignacio June 13, 2013 at 06:02 pm
it was a hundred times better...it is now useless!
Richard Eisenman June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
I'm not a very regular viewer. Could you be a bit more specific about what changed recently (plusesRead More and minuses)? Thanks.
Opera On Tap Co-Manager, Indre Viskontas
Joanna Dyer June 12, 2013 at 07:16 am
F
Molly Rosen June 14, 2013 at 04:36 pm
One of the best operas ever. I hope to see it. How excited for OOT and San Leandro!
Susan Reisz June 10, 2013 at 07:29 pm
Can you reprint this several times prior to June 27. I don't want people to forget about it? Thanks
Unstable vs. stable world views
Michael Moore June 2, 2013 at 06:02 pm
Leah, do you have the authorization from Disney for the use of the copyrighted Dumbo character youRead More use for your blog? I thought that the policy of Patch was to deny access to non-authorized materials such as this.
Leah Hall June 2, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Nope.
Leah Hall June 2, 2013 at 09:44 pm
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a7/Dumbo-1941-poster.jpg My 13 year old daughter justRead More explained how to search www.creativecommons.org.