.
Feedback

Entirely Secondary: Questioning Reductions in Suspections, Expulsions

Columnist Jerry Heverly breaks down his prediction of what the state's controversial proposal of decreasing suspensions and expulsions for minority males would lead to.

(Editor's note: This column is written by San Leandro High School English teacher Jerry Heverly. Its tag line is inspired by education blogger Joe Bower who says that when his students do an experiment, learning is the priority. Getting the correct answer is entirely secondary.)

By Jerry Heverly

I want to make a prediction., A fairly pessimistic one. One that most readers won’t like.

I predict that the will of the People, as expressed through their legislators, will be thwarted by recalcitrant teachers.

I bring it up because I think this case illustrates the way that educational “reform” is sidetracked and ultimately defeated by the traditions and perquisites of teachers. I’ve seen this happen more than once. A lot more.

The issue here is what one commentator referred to as, “disproportionately harsh discipline meted out to Black and Latino boys.”

The state legislature is currently debating a slew of bills meant to address the issue of the African-American and Latino high school student dropout rate. At least eight bills have passed committee this month, all dealing in one way or another with this topic.

The statistics are clear. Black and Latino males don’t graduate at the same rate as other ethnicities, and the Legislature is convinced that one of the causes is the fact that these teens are punished, suspended, and expelled from California high schools at a rate that suggests that the schools are too ready to punish minority kids. 

The most controversial proposal, from Sacramento Democrat Roger Dickinson, would forbid a school from suspending a student for “willful defiance,” a catchall phrase that is often used to characterize disruptive-but-non-violent offenses (for instance, refusing to turn over your cellphone when a teacher tells you to, or simply refusing to follow classroom rules).

What’s clear is that many state officials want to force schools to reduce the number of suspensions and expulsions of Black and Latino students.

I’m not here to argue the merits of any of these bills. My intent is to forecast that none of these laws, if they pass, will change the fate of minority male students in California schools.

Teachers will not like these new laws one bit.

At faculty meetings that I have attended the most passionate speeches by teachers almost always concern the prerogatives of the teacher to remove problem kids from their classrooms.

Teachers get very testy when they think they are being forced to accommodate disruptive kids.

The teacher works behind closed doors, usually the only adult in the room.

The teacher is held responsible for the preservation of good order in the classroom.

If students misbehave, then teachers expect to have the option of sending those students out of the classroom. In severe cases, that can lead to a student being sent home for several days— i.e., suspension.

Administrators know that schools are suspending and expelling Black students at high rates. I assume that every administrator in our school would like to reduce the number of Black and Latino suspensions.

If it is the will of the People to reduce the number of minority suspensions, then I think the following will happen.

Schools will pledge to follow the state’s new guidelines.

They will promulgate new regulations designed to keep African-American and Latino kids in school.

Suspensions will decline dramatically.

And nothing fundamentally will change.

Instead, places will be found to warehouse these kids within the school property but out of regular rooms. They will be given work to do on their own. 

Fewer suspension would not, however, increase the number of minority graduates because it wouldn’t address the reasons why kids drop out.

Top-down reforms are extremely difficult to do in the unique setting of a school building. A better, but slower, way to do this would be to start at the bottom, involving teachers and parents at the beginning of the process.

Only by involving individual teachers and parents in individual schools could there be any hope of real change.

Read other columns from the Entirely Secondary archive.

(Sign up to get San Leandro Patch delivered by email.)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
How did this go from "Ways for San Leandro Teachers to Save in the Classroom" to aRead More advertisement for Staples? I am wondering what Jessica Mitchell does for a living.
california girl May 18, 2013 at 08:05 pm
I loved the green tea!
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Justin Agrella May 19, 2013 at 09:43 am
http://youtu.be/78LAgl90UyM
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
anthony May 18, 2013 at 04:31 pm
remembered reading this here, maybe ther's a forward in thereRead More somewhere...http://sanleandro.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/local-hungry-families-helped-by-urban-farmer. Don't hold me to this one, but I thought Tim at Zocalo Coffee was a keeper.
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
Roy H Gregg May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.