.
Feedback

Census Finds San Leandro Bigger and More Diverse

San Leandro has grown nearly 7 percent in the last 10 years. Both Asians and Hispanics now outnumber whites in the city.

Groups that were once minorities are now clearly the majority in San Leandro, according to data released today from the 2010 Census.

Asians and Latinos each make up a greater percentage of the population in San Leandro than non-Hispanic whites, according to the data. Just 10 years ago, non-Hispanic whites made up more than half of the city’s population.

San Leandro’s population rose nearly 7 percent over the past decade, according to the data, a slower rate than the state as a whole, which grew by 10 percent. The city is now home to just under 85,000 people.

Around 30 percent of residents identified themselves on the census form as Asian. Around 27 percent of them identified themselves as non-Hispanic white.

Overall, 37.6 percent of census responders in San Leandro identified themselves as white, including Hispanics or Latinos. The U.S. Census Bureau considers Hispanic/Latino an ethnicity, not a race, and therefore the numbers overlap.

Black or African American residents make up about 12 percent of the population, while Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders, and American Indians and Alaska Natives each make up less than one percent of the population.

Residents who identified themselves as being of two or more races make up 5.6 percent of the population.

The results mark a substantial demographic change in the city since the last census. In 2000, more than 50 percent of the city’s residents identified themselves as white, 23 percent as Asian and 20 percent as Hispanic or Latino. African Americans made up approximately 10 percent of the population then.

In comparison, Oakland, with a population of about 391,000, is approximately 26 percent non-Hispanic white (35 percent white if Hispanics are included), 27 percent African American, 17 percent Asian, and 25 percent Hispanic, according to 2010 Census data.

Livermore, the city whose size is most similar to San Leandro’s in Alameda County, at 81,000 people, is approximately 65 percent white (75 percent if Hispanics are included), 8 percent Asian, 2 percent African American, and 21 percent Hispanic.

The state’s population grew by 10 percent since the last census, to reach 37.3 million. Non-Hispanic whites make up approximately 40 percent of California’s population. Whites, including Hispanics, make up approximately 58 percent of the state's population.

Hispanics or Latinos of all races make up 37.6 percent of the state's population.

See the table below for more data. 

Total Population by Race (Hispanic exclusive) and Hispanic or Latino: 2010

% of Total Population State/ County/ Place Total Pop. White alone, Not Hispanic Black or African American alone, Not Hispanic Asian alone, Not Hispanic Hispanic or Latino (1) California 37.3m 40.10% 5.80% 12.80% 37.60% Alameda County 1.5m 34.10% 12.20% 25.90% 22.50% Alameda city 73,812 45.30% 6.10% 30.90% 11.00% Albany city 18,539 49.30% 3.30% 31.00% 10.20% Ashland CDP 21,925 15.60% 18.60% 18.10% 42.80% Berkeley city 112,580 54.70% 9.70% 19.10% 10.80% Castro Valley CDP 61,388 49.50% 6.60% 21.10% 17.40% Cherryland CDP 14,728 20.90% 10.80% 9.20% 54.00% Dublin city 46,036 44.30% 9.20% 26.40% 14.50% Emeryville city 10,080 40.20% 17.20% 27.30% 9.20% Fairview CDP 10,003 36.20% 20.50% 14.80% 21.70% Fremont city 214,089 26.50% 3.10% 50.30% 14.80% Hayward city 144,186 18.80% 11.30% 21.60% 40.70% Livermore city 80,968 64.70% 1.90% 8.20% 20.90% Newark city 42,573 27.50% 4.50% 26.80% 35.20% Piedmont city 10,667 71.50% 1.30% 18.00% 3.90% Pleasanton city 70,285 60.80% 1.60% 23.10% 10.30% San Leandro city 84,950 27.10% 11.80% 29.30% 27.40% San Lorenzo CDP 23,452 32.40% 4.50% 21.10% 37.70% Sunol CDP 913 78.80% 0.10% 5.30% 10.00% Union City city 69,516 14.40% 6.00% 50.40% 22.90%

Source: California State Data Center, Department of Finance, based on 2010 data files from the U.S. Census Bureau. 

 

Total Population by Race (Hispanic included in each race group): 2010

% of Total Population State/ County/ City Total Population White Alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone California 37,253,956 57.6% 6.2% 1.0% 13.0% 0.4%   Alameda County 1,510,271 43.0% 12.6% 0.6% 26.1% 0.8% Alameda city 73,812 50.8% 6.4% 0.6% 31.2% 0.5% Albany city 18,539 54.6% 3.5% 0.5% 31.2% 0.2% Ashland CDP 21,925 30.6% 19.5% 1.1% 18.4% 1.2% Berkeley city 112,580 59.5% 10.0% 0.4% 19.3% 0.2% Castro Valley CDP 61,388 58.0% 6.9% 0.5% 21.4% 0.7% Cherryland CDP 14,728 41.0% 11.5% 1.4% 9.5% 2.1% Dublin city 46,036 51.3% 9.4% 0.5% 26.8% 0.6% Emeryville city 10,080 44.5% 17.5% 0.4% 27.5% 0.2% Fairview CDP 10,003 45.0% 21.0% 0.8% 15.2% 1.3% Fremont city 214,089 32.8% 3.3% 0.5% 50.6% 0.5% Hayward city 144,186 34.2% 11.9% 1.0% 22.0% 3.1% Livermore city 80,968 74.6% 2.1% 0.6% 8.4% 0.3% Newark city 42,573 41.3% 4.7% 0.7% 27.2% 1.5% Oakland city 390,724 34.5% 28.0% 0.8% 16.8% 0.6% Piedmont city 10,667 74.2% 1.3% 0.1% 18.2% 0.1% Pleasanton city 70,285 67.0% 1.7% 0.3% 23.2% 0.2% San Leandro city 84,950 37.6% 12.3% 0.8% 29.7% 0.8% San Lorenzo CDP 23,452 47.4% 4.8% 1.0% 21.6% 0.8% Sunol CDP 913 85.4% 0.1% 0.7% 5.3% 0.8% Union City city 69,516 23.9% 6.3% 0.5% 50.9% 1.3%

Source: California State Data Center, Department of Finance, based on 2010 data files from the U.S. Census Bureau. 

 

Population Change of major Race/Ethnic groups in San Leandro and Hispanic, non-hispanic breakdown

POPULATION 2000 2010 Number Percent Number Percent   Total population 79,452 100.0 84,950 100.0 RACE       One race 74,874 94.2 80,195 94.4     White 40,754 51.3 31,946 37.6     Black or African American 7,849 9.9 10,437 12.3     American Indian and Alaska Native 609 0.8 669 0.8     Asian 18,242 23.0 25,206 29.7     Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 683 0.9 642 0.8     Some Other Race 6,737 8.5 11,295 13.3   Two or More Races 4,578 5.8 4,755 5.6         HISPANIC OR LATINO       Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 15,939 20.1 23,237 27.4   Not Hispanic or Latino 63,513 79.9 61,713 72.6

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Data tables accessed via American FactFinder

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
california girl May 18, 2013 at 08:05 pm
I loved the green tea!
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 19, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Young man! The stormtroopers get into the act.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuJXaVrvpXE
Justin Agrella May 19, 2013 at 09:43 am
http://youtu.be/78LAgl90UyM
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
anthony May 18, 2013 at 04:31 pm
remembered reading this here, maybe ther's a forward in thereRead More somewhere...http://sanleandro.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/local-hungry-families-helped-by-urban-farmer. Don't hold me to this one, but I thought Tim at Zocalo Coffee was a keeper.
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
RHG May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Stefanie Pruegel January 29, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I would speculate that more durable, reusable bags still score a lot better than disposables, evenRead More if a small fraction of those are "dual use" as in the cases you point out (dog poop, trash can liner). BTW, for those concerned about a dwindling supply of free poop bags as a result of the ban, here are still plenty of plastic bags available for that purpose e.g. those that people's newspaper comes in. The bottom line is that most people would agree that reusable bags are the better solution than to continue choking our waterways with disposable plastic bags.
David January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm
There are plenty of competing studies that disagree. I perused that, and one huge faulty assumptionRead More that they have is that "single use" means single use when as we see above, people use them for dogs, garbage etc.
Stefanie Pruegel January 21, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Funny you should bring up cost/benefit analysis of disposable plastic bags vs reusable bags, David.Read More This is exactly what was done in 2010 by a coalition of several California cities and organizations, to help communities in the state gauge the impact of any ordinance they consider passing in regards to disposable bags. The upshot is that reusable bags (particularly non-woven plastic reusable bags) have significantly lower environmental impacts on a per-use basis than single-use plastic bags. Find the full study here: http://bit.ly/VWdEn9
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.