.
Feedback

Local Factory Bows To Bad Times, Outsourcing

Through great exertion the Best family brings a renowned factory brand to San Leandro, where it survives for decades until the onset of outsourcing.

 

(This three-part series is based on “Making Tracks,” a book by Ed and Sue Claessen, who tell how Daniel Best and his son, Clarence Leo (C. L.) created steam, diesel and gas-powered tractors that replaced horse power and transformed many industries -- and San Leandro. Part One and early career. Part Two described .)

By Fred Reicker 

Despite being groomed as the heir to the family business, C.L. Best was not fed by a silver spoon. Quite the contrary, he endured a painful takeover by the rival Holt Manufacturing and felt obliged to quit the firm his father built and start his own company.

To do this, C.l. Best needed the help of outside investors -- who got nervous and wanted to sell out.

The buyer was a cash-rich former sales manager for a sewing machine company who had become familiar with the new Best company and its gas-powered products.

C. L. Hawkins  -- not to be confused with the Best heir -- saw and seized his opportunity. Hawkins bought 51 percent of the new Best company’s shares, including some from the Woodland investors, and became president in March 1917. C.L. Best was relegated to the position of vice president in the company he had founded.

But when Hawkins’ personality, character and business tactics began to jeopardize the business, C.L. Best mounted a successful effort to regain control. This included buying shares of stock still in the company’s treasury, which gave him a majority position, a move Hawkins unsuccessfully challenged in a suit.

In the meantime, Best and Holt continued their litigious relationship and remained fierce competitors in business -- and on the baseball diamond.

Both companies fielded semi-professional teams—the Best Tractors and the Holt Caterpillars.

But the ninth inning in this business rivalry was within sight.

Using its family connections, Holt secured World War I contracts to the exclusion of Best. But the cost was a loss of domestic market share.

By 1919, with new cash in hand and litigation settled, C.L. Best was ready to take the leadership in the track-type tractor market.

The company’s signature tractor Model A Sixty went into production, the first in a long line of constantly improved, more powerful and more versatile machines.

Business boomed for Best while Holt, the larger of the two with its Stockton and Peoria plants, had difficulty competing in the post-war market.

An internal Holt report in 1924 warned that its “volume would be menaced” if Best’s progress in 1925 matched that of the prior year.

Meanwhile, C. L. and his management team felt that a new plant east of the Rockies was imperative to get closer to suppliers and customers. They cast an opportunistic eye on Holt’s Peoria plant.

Best was now financially robust. Not so Holt. Sales were soft, capacity was underutilized and part of a short- term loan was coming due.

The Best management team and its investment banker got busy.

They developed a strategy to side-step the bitter rivalry between the two companies: it called for C.L. staying in the background, and for a business combination in which both companies would cease to exist and a third new company would take control and be headquartered in San Francisco.

Leading from its position of strength, Best initiated talks that were conducted in “total secrecy.” But Bay Area newspapers were soon speculating about them and their outcome.

The suspense ended with the announcement that the new Caterpillar Tractor Co., with headquarters in San Francisco, had been incorporated in California on April 15, 1925.

The book’s authors note that with Best’s dominance in the track-type tractor field, and with seven Best managers and associates on the nine-member board, it “was clear who held the reins at the new company.”

The company’s offices were moved to San Leandro that July.

“Making Tracks” goes on to recount Best’s growth through the 1930s, including the pivotal development of the first Diesel engine for track-laying tractors. “Old Betsy”, serial number 1 A 14 was completed at the San Leandro plant in June 1930 and is now in the Smithsonian Institution.

The engine was the catalyst for a major change in the business. Tractor production would be concentrated at the larger Peoria operation.

San Leandro, where so much had been invested in refining and adapting Diesel technology, became the Research Division and continued as home office.

By the mid-1930s, the authors state, “Caterpillar Diesel was the acknowledged leader in its field.”

C.L. Best died on Sept. 22, 1951. Daniel predeceased him on Aug. 22, 1923. These visionaries and the people they brought together launched an enterprise that had world -wide sales of $58.7 billion in 2011 and 104,000 employees. (VALUE LINE Investment Survey)

Caterpillar contintued to maintain a strong presence in San Leandro until the end of the 1970s, when employment at the local facility was about 2,000. But by 1985, with a weak economy and a wave manufacturing outsourcing, Caterpillar laid off the last 50 workers at "a once-bustling plant opened by a young sharpshooter named Daniel Best," according to a Los Angeles Times report.

Should “Best” be to tractors as “Ford” is to automobiles? Read this handsomely designed and meticulously researched book to answer that question for yourself. Excellent reproductions of photos, drawings and compelling marketing materials provide great visual interest. There’s also an engaging Best family history enlivened by numerous anecdotes

The San Leandro Public Library is acknowledged for the photos and art that it made available from its Historical Photograph Collection. Librarian Mary Lee Barr and Assistant History Researcher Kay Arnold assisted the authors.

Making Tracks” is written by Ed and Sue Claessen and can be purchased for $35.  It is also available in the library. Fred Reicker is a former member and chair of the San Leandro Library and Historical Commission.

(Get San Leandro Patch delivered by email. Like us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter @sanleandropatch)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Leandro Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
california girl May 18, 2013 at 08:05 pm
I loved the green tea!
anthony May 17, 2013 at 01:01 pm
go nuts, or one of each... for later of course. would go scone myself, old habits die hard.
Leah Hall May 19, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Young man! The stormtroopers get into the act.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuJXaVrvpXE
Justin Agrella May 19, 2013 at 09:43 am
http://youtu.be/78LAgl90UyM
Leah Hall May 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Youth development, healthy living & social responsibility... ...in San Leandro! For the firstRead More time ever! Thanks to everyone who brought the YMCA "Move-A-Thon" to San Leandro and all the families that participated! -Leah Hall SL Human Services Commissioner & Volunteer YMCA Youth & Government advisor (for our San Leandro delegation comprised of San Leandro high school students)
anthony May 18, 2013 at 04:31 pm
remembered reading this here, maybe ther's a forward in thereRead More somewhere...http://sanleandro.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/local-hungry-families-helped-by-urban-farmer. Don't hold me to this one, but I thought Tim at Zocalo Coffee was a keeper.
Richard Mellor May 15, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I have a friend who has just had a hive put in her garden If you would like me to put u in touchRead More with her contact me at aactivist@igc.org
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:02 am
Thanks for posting in our Announcements Board, Christa! I shared this on our Facebook page. I hopeRead More this helps you in your hunt for honey bees :)
RHG May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
First let me say sorry for the loss of one of your family. Ive been keeping my eyes pealed incase IRead More see him. But I'd recomend since he is going blind, it might be easyer for someone to catch him if we knew his name. Just a thought. Hope for his safe return.
Carol Parker May 14, 2013 at 08:45 pm
I'm happy to report Buster found a forever home on Mother's Day. There are other bassets availableRead More for adoption on Golden Gate Basset Rescue's website, however. Adoptable dogs will be on hand June 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Pet Food Express on Blanding Avenue (in the shopping center of Nob Hill Foods) in Alameda. Come down and see some hounds up close and personal.
Stefanie Pruegel January 29, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I would speculate that more durable, reusable bags still score a lot better than disposables, evenRead More if a small fraction of those are "dual use" as in the cases you point out (dog poop, trash can liner). BTW, for those concerned about a dwindling supply of free poop bags as a result of the ban, here are still plenty of plastic bags available for that purpose e.g. those that people's newspaper comes in. The bottom line is that most people would agree that reusable bags are the better solution than to continue choking our waterways with disposable plastic bags.
David January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm
There are plenty of competing studies that disagree. I perused that, and one huge faulty assumptionRead More that they have is that "single use" means single use when as we see above, people use them for dogs, garbage etc.
Stefanie Pruegel January 21, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Funny you should bring up cost/benefit analysis of disposable plastic bags vs reusable bags, David.Read More This is exactly what was done in 2010 by a coalition of several California cities and organizations, to help communities in the state gauge the impact of any ordinance they consider passing in regards to disposable bags. The upshot is that reusable bags (particularly non-woven plastic reusable bags) have significantly lower environmental impacts on a per-use basis than single-use plastic bags. Find the full study here: http://bit.ly/VWdEn9
Sarah Nash May 10, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Just had a chance to read this story. Loved it! While I believe that conscientious students wouldRead More try their best at the test, as I did when I took state aptitude tests in school, I can hardly imagine staying up nights worrying about it! There is nothing at stake except perhaps personal satisfaction so the test itself shouldn't impose stress. A high-strung parent, on the other hand, might.
David April 27, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Oh come on, Rob. You talk about me cherry picking stuff? 10/10? Sure. And as I've shown you canRead More pull out Maxwell Park, North Oakland, parts of SF (Glen Park, for example), parts of El Cerrito and other locations to show that API scores aren't well-correlated with property values. Again, why do homes sell for the same $/sq foot in Maxwell Park as Estudillo Estates? San Lorenzo's API is about the same or better than most of SLUSD. Property values there are lower. The clearest example of what effect API scores have on property values was mentioned below, about a 10% difference depending on which side of the tracks, er, 580 you live on in Castro Valley. 10%? whoopdedo, that kind of variation is washed out when you factor in commute times, crime, amenities, etc. In fact, API scores are likely to continue to shrink as a factor in RE values as more and more parents flee the public schools, no matter what the API (witness SLUSD, the 30% drop in OUSD enrollment in just the past decade, etc). In another generation, we'll be accused by our children of child abuse by having sent them to public schools.
Rob Rich April 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm
If you accept the premise that API scores are poorly correlated with real estate vualues, then is itRead More coincidental that the top school districts are in areas with high real estate values? http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/7046-ten-california-school-districts-highest-test-scores-2012.gs. In the old days, 10 for 10 was considered pretty good correlation.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:58 am
To my point. Fred, we can agree to disagree, but here's my point: Leah, you have repeatedly sungRead More the praises of BUSD. More than a few of your neighbors and those in the other upper middle/lower upper class areas of SL think similarly. BUSD, as I have also pointed out, does a *worse* job, relative to SLUSD, of educating what I presume you'd call "stressed" kids--those in poor socioeconomic strata, blacks and Hispanics of whatever color. Yet, you hold BUSD up as a great system. It's not. The only reason you and your fellow travelers in the Broadmoor/Estates/Bay-O think it is, is due to the presence of "enough" upper class white/Asian kids who perform well enough to drag up the overall scores. This has a beneficial effect on property values, demographics etc in places like Berkeley and certain neighborhoods in Oakland. How to quickly achieve that in SLUSD? Re-organize the schools so that they're K-8. We'd automatically get better scoring K-8 schools in the Roosevelt/Bancroft districts, and with those high performing schools in the Manor. With a stroke, you'd get 40-50% of K-8 kids in SLUSD in "high performing" API 800+ schools. And Fred, we'd just have to disagree here. Schools of reasonable size like Hillcrest (K-8, upper class area) do just fine, I think a similar dynamic would work here in the Estates etc.
David April 15, 2013 at 09:54 am
Leah, I *highly* doubt the kids' poor outcomes result form "everyday stress." As I'veRead More repeatedly pointed out, 7/8 of my great-grandparents never progressed passed 8th or 9th grade, yet they all achieved higher levels of literacy and numeracy than those demonstrated repeatedly by Mr. Heverly's high school students. As for everyday stresses, need we go into life in the 1880's/1890's and how easy people have it today? You want to compare today's "stresses" to those of being a black girl in Mobile Alabama in 1890, or a black guy in Beaumont Texas in 1890? Moving on to today's world, and your ridiculous comments. As Fred points out, kids today get food paid for by us taxpayers, classes under 30 students (not that class size has *EVER* been demonstrated to do anything for students, but it does increase the numbers of teacher union members...). Cont..
Fred Eiger April 15, 2013 at 02:23 am
I doubt it David, times have gotten worse. With billions of money wasted on welfare, rentRead More subsidies, free school breakfasts and lunches all we have to show are fat, lazy ignoramus' sloths who only want more welfare and continue to produce idiots. Leah, your educational views are abject failures. It's times for you and your ilk to just go away and leave the educational system to the adults who know what works.